Bank custody infrastructure after SAB 122
How regulated banks and qualified custodians safeguard Bitcoin and digital assets for institutional clients under modern accounting, regulatory and operational frameworks.
| Institution / Provider | Type | Custody Offering | Jurisdiction | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Bank Custodian |
Digital Asset Custody Enterprise Wallets |
U.S. / Global | Active |
|
|
Bank Custodian |
Digital Assets Platform Wallets & Custody |
U.S. / Global | Active (2026) |
|
|
Qualified Custodian |
Crypto Custody & Financing |
U.S. | Institutional |
|
|
Qualified Custodian | Institutional Custody | U.S. / Global | Institutional |
|
|
Qualified Custodian | Institutional Custody | U.S. | Institutional |
| Model | Key Control | Regulatory Structure | Operational Model | Typical Use Case | Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank Custody | Custodian | Regulated Bank | Institutional | Institutional clients, funds, corporates | Low–Medium |
| Qualified / Specialist Custody | Custodian | Entity Specific | Institutional | Hedge funds, institutions, family offices | Medium |
| Self-Custody | Asset Owner | None Inherent | Direct | Protocols, funds, large institutions | High |
| Exchange Custody | Platform | Platform Specific | Trading-Linked | Retail / active trading | High |